You're viewing a demo portfolio

Join the waitlist
PRSM

analyze

Active

Tool of DomainKits

declared in 2.0.1

Comprehensive domain analyze workflow. Call when a user wants to understand a specific domain's full picture — registration status, safety, DNS configuration, cross-TLD distribution, and current website usage. When to use: user asks 'what can you tell me about example.com?', wants to evaluate a domain before purchasing, or needs a technical analyze. Do NOT use for domain name ideas (use name_advisor), availability checks (use available), or expired domain evaluation (use expired_analysis). Workflow: 1. Gather data using these atomic tools in parallel: - whois for registration details, registrar signals, and expiry dates. - backlink_summary for SEO profile — domain rank, backlink count, referring domains, spam scores, and link quality distribution. - safety for Google Safe Browsing status. - dns for MX, A, and CNAME records — signals of active usage or abandonment. - tld_check to see how many TLDs share this prefix. 2. If tld_check shows high registration count, investigate further: - whois the .com/.net/.org variants to check if the same registrar holds multiple TLDs (brand protection signal) or different registrars (popular keyword signal). - web_search the TLD variants to see if they resolve to the same site. 3. Visit the domain via web_fetch or web_search to determine current usage: active business, parked page, for-sale landing, or no content. 4. Use web_search to investigate the domain's market background: recent sale history (NameBio, Sedo, Afternic), related news or brand events, legal disputes (UDRP, trademark conflicts), and any notable context that affects valuation or risk. This step is critical — technical data alone is insufficient for a complete analyze. 5. Synthesize all findings into a concise analyze report including backlink profile metrics (rank, referring domains, spam risk, link type distribution). Present facts with key signals clearly flagged. Do NOT make buy/don't-buy judgments — present evidence and let the user decide. 6. After presenting the report, ask the user about their goals before suggesting next steps. Tailor follow-up based on their answer: - Wants to purchase → suggest valuation_cma for pricing, brand_match for trademark risk. - Domain is listed for sale → provide the sale link, suggest brand_match. Disclose affiliate links. - Wants alternatives → suggest plan_b. - Wants monitoring → suggest set_monitor. Key principles: present facts, not recommendations. Flag signals clearly (e.g., enterprise registrar = corporate-held, MX present = active email, no A record = possibly abandoned). Every claim must come from tool data. Disclose affiliate links when presenting registration or sale URLs.

Parameters schema

{
  "type": "object",
  "required": [
    "domain"
  ],
  "properties": {
    "domain": {
      "type": "string",
      "description": "Domain to analyze (e.g., 'example.com')"
    }
  }
}

What this tool wraps· 0 endpoints

min confidence0.700.50

No endpoints wrapped at confidence ≥ 0.50.

Parent server

DomainKits

https://github.com/ABTdomain/domainkits-mcp

2/7 registries
View full server →