get_composite_site_score
ActiveTool of cloud.dchub/mcp-server
Use when a user wants ONE honest 0-100 site suitability/risk verdict for a lat/lon WITH an explicit per-factor coverage map — which factors are actually measured vs. declared unavailable. Unlike analyze_site (full raw data dump), this scores ONLY over VALIDATED factors and never imputes a missing one: power/grid, fiber, natural-hazard risk (FEMA NRI) and water (live WRI Aqueduct 4.0 baseline water stress) are all live; water is "unavailable" only outside basin coverage (never faked); market/DCPI is v1-unavailable (use rank_markets). Example: get_composite_site_score lat=33.45 lon=-112.07 state=AZ. Returns {composite_score (0-100 over validated factors), verdict (BUILD/CAUTION/AVOID), confidence (complete|conditional), coverage {power_grid|fiber|water|risk_resilience|market_dcpi: validated|unavailable}, coverage_ratio, sub_scores, caveats}. Use analyze_site for full data, compare_sites for 2-4 sites, rank_markets for whole-market ranking.
Parameters schema
{
"type": "object",
"$schema": "http://json-schema.org/draft-07/schema#",
"properties": {
"lat": {
"type": "number",
"description": "Site latitude in decimal degrees (-90 to 90, required), e.g. 33.45"
},
"lng": {
"type": "number",
"description": "Alias for lon — either name works"
},
"lon": {
"type": "number",
"description": "Site longitude in decimal degrees (-180 to 180, required), e.g. -112.07"
},
"state": {
"type": "string",
"description": "US state abbreviation (optional) — improves water/context lookups, e.g. AZ"
},
"latitude": {
"type": "number",
"description": "Alias for lat — either name works"
},
"longitude": {
"type": "number",
"description": "Alias for lon — either name works"
}
}
}No endpoints wrapped at confidence ≥ 0.70.
Parent server
cloud.dchub/mcp-server
https://github.com/azmartone67/dchub-backend
1/7 registries